From 0201d9ab7db8c519710094f6cdd3eb57b1bc9c44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pietro Di Bello Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:58:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update URL for a blogpost linked in the README Update URL for the "Writing Good Tests for the Gilded Rose Kata" post --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 423c33da..2621bb30 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ As Bobby Johnson points out in his article ["Why Most Solutions to Gilded Rose M better practice at handling a legacy code situation if you do this Kata in the original C#. However, I think this kata is also really useful for practicing writing good tests using different frameworks and approaches, and the small changes I've made help with that. I think it's also interesting to compare what the refactored code and tests look like in different programming languages. -I wrote this article ["Writing Good Tests for the Gilded Rose Kata"](http://emilybache.blogspot.se/2013/03/writing-good-tests-for-gilded-rose-kata.html) about how you could use this kata in a [coding dojo](https://leanpub.com/codingdojohandbook). +I wrote this article ["Writing Good Tests for the Gilded Rose Kata"](http://coding-is-like-cooking.info/2013/03/writing-good-tests-for-the-gilded-rose-kata/) about how you could use this kata in a [coding dojo](https://leanpub.com/codingdojohandbook). ## How to use this Kata