From afe5350167e600431286d3fb22c0c5e25ecfd78b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Hoover Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:15:07 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Remove broken links to cyber-dojo from README.md Like the the README.md files for Racing-Car-Katas and the Tennis-Refactoring-Kata did, this README.md for GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata has. (This is my last PR about cyber-dojo.) --- README.md | 22 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index d00d23ff..0baa248f 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -24,28 +24,6 @@ Whichever testing approach you choose, the idea of the exercise is to do some de This code comes with comprehensive tests that use this approach. For information about how to run them, see the [texttests README](https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata/tree/master/texttests) -## Get going quickly using Cyber-Dojo - -I've also set this kata up on [cyber-dojo](https://cyber-dojo.org) for several languages, so you can get going really quickly: - -To create an *individual* exercise: -- [C#, NUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/Fz4xFX?index=3) -- [C++ (g++), GoogleTest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/qPPrZy?index=7) -- [Java, Cucumber](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/SvUf30?index=2) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you -- [Java, JUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/aJJEN4?index=2) -- [Python, unittest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/NFgFys?index=2) -- [Ruby, RSpec](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/D3xbUV?index=3) -- [Ruby, testunit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/zlElgj?index=9) - -To create a *group* exercise: -- [C#, NUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/Fz4xFX?index=3) -- [C++ (g++), GoogleTest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/qPPrZy?index=7) -- [Java, Cucumber](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/SvUf30?index=2) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you -- [Java, JUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/aJJEN4?index=2) -- [Python, unittest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/NFgFys?index=2) -- [Ruby, RSpec](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/D3xbUV?index=3) -- [Ruby, testunit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/zlElgj?index=9) - ## Better Code Hub I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low!