OpenSource/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata.git synced 2025-12-12 20:32:15 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove broken links to cyber-dojo from README.md

Browse Source 
Like the the README.md files for Racing-Car-Katas and the Tennis-Refactoring-Kata did, this README.md for GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata has. 
(This is my last PR about cyber-dojo.)
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Hoover 2020-12-10 14:15:07 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent e2c5826e71
commit afe5350167
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 0 additions and 22 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

22
README.md
View File

@ -24,28 +24,6 @@ Whichever testing approach you choose, the idea of the exercise is to do some de
This code comes with comprehensive tests that use this approach. For information about how to run them, see the [texttests README](https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata/tree/master/texttests) This code comes with comprehensive tests that use this approach. For information about how to run them, see the [texttests README](https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata/tree/master/texttests)
## Get going quickly using Cyber-Dojo
I've also set this kata up on [cyber-dojo](https://cyber-dojo.org) for several languages, so you can get going really quickly:
To create an *individual* exercise:
- [C#, NUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/Fz4xFX?index=3)
- [C++ (g++), GoogleTest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/qPPrZy?index=7)
- [Java, Cucumber](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/SvUf30?index=2) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you
- [Java, JUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/aJJEN4?index=2)
- [Python, unittest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/NFgFys?index=2)
- [Ruby, RSpec](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/D3xbUV?index=3)
- [Ruby, testunit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/zlElgj?index=9)
To create a *group* exercise:
- [C#, NUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/Fz4xFX?index=3)
- [C++ (g++), GoogleTest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/qPPrZy?index=7)
- [Java, Cucumber](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/SvUf30?index=2) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you
- [Java, JUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/aJJEN4?index=2)
- [Python, unittest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/NFgFys?index=2)
- [Ruby, RSpec](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/D3xbUV?index=3)
- [Ruby, testunit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/zlElgj?index=9)
## Better Code Hub ## Better Code Hub
I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low! I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low!