mirror of
https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata.git
synced 2025-12-12 12:22:12 +00:00
remove BetterCode Hub, since it's no longer working. Improve info on TextTest.
This commit is contained in:
parent
54cf2e5da8
commit
d7b0cefc1a
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Whichever testing approach you choose, the idea of the exercise is to do some de
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Text-Based Approval Testing
|
## Text-Based Approval Testing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This code comes with comprehensive tests that use this approach. For information about how to run them, see the [texttests README](https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata/tree/master/texttests)
|
Most language versions of this code have a [TextTest](https://texttest.org) fixture for Approval testing. For information about this, see the [TextTests README](https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata/tree/master/texttests)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Translating this code
|
## Translating this code
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -51,8 +51,3 @@ Please don't write too much code in the starting position or add too many unit t
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
If your programming language doesn't have an easy way to add a command-line interface, then the TextTest fixture is probably not necessary.
|
If your programming language doesn't have an easy way to add a command-line interface, then the TextTest fixture is probably not necessary.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Better Code Hub
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low!
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[](https://bettercodehub.com/)
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user