From f76aff16c07a90fea6deb2a93b95e32522e3e64f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: emilybache Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:50:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] added better code hub badge to readme file --- README.md | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index c31395e9..83f8e59d 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -39,3 +39,9 @@ I've also set this kata up on [cyber-dojo](http://cyber-dojo.org) for several la - [RSpec, Ruby](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/8E58B0AD16?avatar=raccoon&tag=3) - [Python](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/297041AA7A?avatar=lion&tag=4) - [Cucumber, Java](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/0F82D4BA89?avatar=gorilla&tag=45) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you + +# Better Code Hub + +I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low! + +[![BCH compliance](https://bettercodehub.com/edge/badge/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata?branch=master)](https://bettercodehub.com/)