OpenSource/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata
1
0 Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata.git synced 2026-10-13 17:49:25 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #199 from JeffHoover/patch-1

Browse Source 
Remove broken links to cyber-dojo from README.md
This commit is contained in:
Emily Bache authored and GitHub committed 2020-12-11 07:53:56 +01:00
2 parents e2c5826e71 afe5350167
commit 1d71dbc460
1 file changed
-22
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
README.md
-22
View File
@@ -24,28 +24,6 @@ Whichever testing approach you choose, the idea of the exercise is to do some de
This code comes with comprehensive tests that use this approach. For information about how to run them, see the [texttests README](https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata/tree/master/texttests)
## Get going quickly using Cyber-Dojo
I've also set this kata up on [cyber-dojo](https://cyber-dojo.org) for several languages, so you can get going really quickly:
To create an *individual* exercise:
- [C#, NUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/Fz4xFX?index=3)
- [C++ (g++), GoogleTest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/qPPrZy?index=7)
- [Java, Cucumber](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/SvUf30?index=2) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you
- [Java, JUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/aJJEN4?index=2)
- [Python, unittest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/NFgFys?index=2)
- [Ruby, RSpec](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/D3xbUV?index=3)
- [Ruby, testunit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/zlElgj?index=9)
To create a *group* exercise:
- [C#, NUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/Fz4xFX?index=3)
- [C++ (g++), GoogleTest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/qPPrZy?index=7)
- [Java, Cucumber](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/SvUf30?index=2) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you
- [Java, JUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/aJJEN4?index=2)
- [Python, unittest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/NFgFys?index=2)
- [Ruby, RSpec](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/D3xbUV?index=3)
- [Ruby, testunit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/zlElgj?index=9)
## Better Code Hub
I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low!