Merge pull request #199 from JeffHoover/patch-1

Remove broken links to cyber-dojo from README.md
This commit is contained in:
Emily Bache 2020-12-11 07:53:56 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 1d71dbc460
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -24,28 +24,6 @@ Whichever testing approach you choose, the idea of the exercise is to do some de
This code comes with comprehensive tests that use this approach. For information about how to run them, see the [texttests README](https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata/tree/master/texttests)
## Get going quickly using Cyber-Dojo
I've also set this kata up on [cyber-dojo](https://cyber-dojo.org) for several languages, so you can get going really quickly:
To create an *individual* exercise:
- [C#, NUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/Fz4xFX?index=3)
- [C++ (g++), GoogleTest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/qPPrZy?index=7)
- [Java, Cucumber](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/SvUf30?index=2) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you
- [Java, JUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/aJJEN4?index=2)
- [Python, unittest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/NFgFys?index=2)
- [Ruby, RSpec](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/D3xbUV?index=3)
- [Ruby, testunit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_individual/zlElgj?index=9)
To create a *group* exercise:
- [C#, NUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/Fz4xFX?index=3)
- [C++ (g++), GoogleTest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/qPPrZy?index=7)
- [Java, Cucumber](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/SvUf30?index=2) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you
- [Java, JUnit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/aJJEN4?index=2)
- [Python, unittest](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/NFgFys?index=2)
- [Ruby, RSpec](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/D3xbUV?index=3)
- [Ruby, testunit](https://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork_group/zlElgj?index=9)
## Better Code Hub
I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low!