OpenSource/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata.git synced 2025-12-11 20:02:09 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tweaked formatting

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
emilybache 2017-05-12 11:51:16 +02:00
parent f76aff16c0
commit 62276f5f0f
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
README.md
View File

@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
# Gilded Rose Refactoring Kata
This Kata was originally created by Terry Hughes (http://twitter.com/#!/TerryHughes). It is already on GitHub [here](https://github.com/NotMyself/GildedRose). See also [Bobby Johnson's description of the kata](http://iamnotmyself.com/2011/02/13/refactor-this-the-gilded-rose-kata/).
I translated the original C# into a few other languages, (with a little help from my friends!), and slightly changed the starting position. This means I've actually done a small amount of refactoring already compared with the original form of the kata, and made it easier to get going with writing tests by giving you one failing unit test to start with. I also added test fixtures for Text-Based approval testing with TextTest (see [the TextTests](https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata/tree/master/texttests))
@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ I've also set this kata up on [cyber-dojo](http://cyber-dojo.org) for several la
- [Python](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/297041AA7A?avatar=lion&tag=4)
- [Cucumber, Java](http://cyber-dojo.org/forker/fork/0F82D4BA89?avatar=gorilla&tag=45) - for this one I've also written some step definitions for you
# Better Code Hub
## Better Code Hub
I analysed this repo according to the clean code standards on [Better Code Hub](https://bettercodehub.com) just to get an independent opinion of how bad the code is. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the compliance score is low!