mirror of
https://github.com/emilybache/GildedRose-Refactoring-Kata.git
synced 2026-02-06 02:02:31 +00:00
96 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
96 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
# Security Analysis: GildedRose Refactoring Kata
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUES
|
||
|
||
### 1. SQL Injection Vulnerabilities
|
||
- **Finding:** None found. The project does not interact with any databases or execute SQL queries.
|
||
|
||
### 2. Cross-site Scripting (XSS) Risks
|
||
- **Finding:** None found. The project is a backend Java application with no web interface or HTML output.
|
||
|
||
### 3. Authentication/Authorization Flaws
|
||
- **Finding:** None found. There is no authentication or authorization logic in the codebase.
|
||
|
||
### 4. Input Validation Gaps
|
||
- **Severity:** Low
|
||
- **Location:** `GildedRose.java`, constructor and `wrapItem` method
|
||
- **Explanation:**
|
||
- The code does not validate the `items` array or individual `Item` objects for null values or invalid data (e.g., negative quality, null names).
|
||
- While not a direct security risk in this context, lack of validation could lead to unexpected exceptions or logic errors if the code is ever extended to accept user input.
|
||
- **Concrete Fix:**
|
||
```java
|
||
public GildedRose(Item[] items) {
|
||
if (items == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Items array cannot be null");
|
||
this.items = new UpdatableItem[items.length];
|
||
for (int i = 0; i < items.length; i++) {
|
||
if (items[i] == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Item at index " + i + " is null");
|
||
if (items[i].name == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Item name cannot be null");
|
||
if (items[i].quality < 0) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Item quality cannot be negative");
|
||
this.items[i] = wrapItem(items[i]);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
- **Prevention Strategies:**
|
||
- Always validate input, even if it is currently internal.
|
||
- Add unit tests for invalid data scenarios.
|
||
|
||
### 5. Sensitive Data Exposure
|
||
- **Finding:** None found. No sensitive data (passwords, keys, PII) is handled or stored.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## SECURITY CONCERNS
|
||
|
||
### 1. Hardcoded Secrets/Passwords
|
||
- **Finding:** None found. No secrets, passwords, or API keys are present in the codebase.
|
||
|
||
### 2. Insecure Data Transmission
|
||
- **Finding:** None found. The application does not transmit data over a network.
|
||
|
||
### 3. Weak Error Handling
|
||
- **Severity:** Low
|
||
- **Location:** General (e.g., `GildedRose.java` constructor)
|
||
- **Explanation:**
|
||
- The code throws generic exceptions (e.g., `IllegalArgumentException`) without custom error messages or logging.
|
||
- In a larger system, this could make debugging or security monitoring more difficult.
|
||
- **Concrete Fix:**
|
||
```java
|
||
if (items == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Items array cannot be null (GildedRose.java:5)");
|
||
```
|
||
- **Prevention Strategies:**
|
||
- Use descriptive error messages.
|
||
- Consider logging errors for audit trails in production systems.
|
||
|
||
### 4. Missing Rate Limiting
|
||
- **Finding:** None found. The application does not expose any endpoints or services.
|
||
|
||
### 5. Cryptographic Weaknesses
|
||
- **Finding:** None found. No cryptographic operations are performed.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Summary Table
|
||
|
||
| Issue Type | Severity | Location/Line(s) | Explanation & Fix |
|
||
|---------------------------|----------|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
| Input validation gaps | Low | GildedRose.java (5–13) | Add null/invalid checks for items and fields. See code example above. |
|
||
| Weak error handling | Low | GildedRose.java (5–13) | Use descriptive error messages and consider logging. |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Prevention Strategies (General)
|
||
- Always validate all input, even if it is not user-facing.
|
||
- Avoid hardcoding secrets or sensitive data.
|
||
- Use descriptive error messages and log errors where appropriate.
|
||
- If adding network/database features in the future, follow secure coding best practices (parameterized queries, HTTPS, etc.).
|
||
- Regularly review dependencies for vulnerabilities.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Conclusion
|
||
|
||
**No critical or high-severity security issues were found.**
|
||
The only minor concerns are around input validation and error handling, which are best practices for future extensibility and robustness.
|
||
If you plan to extend this project (e.g., add a web interface, database, or external input), revisit this analysis and apply secure coding principles accordingly. |